|
최근 AAT 케이스입니다.
배** 라는 한국인입니다.
2001년 1월 23일 (20년전) 호주에 영어연수후 학교를 입학하기 위해 학생비자를 소지하고 처음 호주에 입국을 합니다.
The applicant in this case is a South Korean woman who first arrived in Australia on 23 January 2001 utilising an initial Student (Class TU) (Subclass 560) visa.
그리고 호주에서 공부를 한 내용이 아래와 같습니다. 학생비자만 9번째라고 합니다. 보는 것처럼 정말 길고 다양한 공부를 했다고 보여집니다.
Study History in Australia
- Since arriving in Australia, the applicant has been enrolled in the following courses:
- Intensive English which she completed;
- Years 9-12 at High School at Geelong College in Victoria.
- Diploma of Textiles, Clothing and Footwear which she completed;
- Bachelor OF applied Science which she completed;
- Certificate III and IV in Hairdressing which she completed;
- A Diploma of Salon Management which she completed;
- A Diploma of Screen and Media which she completed; and
- A Bachelor of Fashion Business which she is studying now and which is scheduled to conclude in July 2021.
마지막 Fashion Business 학사 학위 코스를 위한 비자를 신청했을때 2018년 9월 12일 학생비자 거절이 되고 AAT 재심을 신청한 것입니다.
- This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 12 September 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
지금부터 과거 그러니까 거의 18.5년 동안 임시비자를 소지하고 보시는 것처럼 다양한 공부를 하다가 학사학위를 신청했지만 이민성 case officer도 그렇고 재심관도 genuine temporary entrant (GTE) 라고 고려하지 않은 것입니다.
이 AAT 케이스가 거의 19년 12개월이 되는 시점에서 결정이 됩니다만 믿지 않았던 것입니다.
- The Tribunal finds that the length of time the applicant has been onshore and proposes to be onshore, 21 years approximately, is wholly irreconcilable with the notion that one is a genuine temporary entrant on any reasonable view.
- The Tribunal finds that the applicant’s working history in Australia (although it acknowledges that the applicant is not working presently) when considered against the fact that strong economic prospects in her home country have not been evidenced, may be a motivating factor for the applicant to remain in Australia on a more permanent basis, rather than out of a genuine desire to temporarily reside in Australia as a student.
- The Tribunal places significant weight on the fact that the applicant has been in Australia since 2001 and undertaken a significant number of courses which are not consistent with one another, as being behaviour that is inconsistent with that of a genuine student. The Tribunal informed the applicant that her study history and length of time she has been in the country may be the reason or part of the reason for affirming the delegate’s decision and invited the applicant to comment or respond.
- The Tribunal simply does not find this behaviour to be consistent with that of a genuine student who intends to remain in Australia temporarily. Rather, the Tribunal finds that this behaviour demonstrates an intention to use the student migration program to maintain ongoing residence in Australia.
공부를 오래하고 코스를 바꾼다고 해서 반드시 GTE 만족한다는 것도 아님을 알 수 있습니다. 오히려 악 영향을 줄 수 있음이에요.
코스를 선택할 때 주의해야 하고 genuine 임을 꼭 보여줘야 할 것입니다.
원문 AAT 재심 판결문 보기
Last update: 2021년 2월 2일
물맑은 호주이민닷컴
이민법무사 (0208335)
신순철
PS 이 케이스를 보다가 발견했습니다만 배씨와 그녀의 가족이 한국에 많은 돈과 땅 소유하고 있다고 ….
The applicant and her family have significant cash and land holdings in South Korea.
|
